Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
770 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

random - Efficient use of Octave's randsample (with weights) in a situation of huge vector and most weights equal to zero

In an upcoming simulation project, I will come in a situation where I will have to draw one random element from a huge vector in a weighted sense. For most elements of the vector, the assigned weight will be zero. I also need to draw only one element, so the replacement or no replacement function is irrelevant.

This random picking step will be the bottleneck for my simulation, so getting the best efficiency and speed will be critical.

Are there any hacks/tips on what is best to do? Are there any important savings possible in the context of my project?

PS: Is randsample reliable on huge vectors?

question from:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/66045855/efficient-use-of-octaves-randsample-with-weights-in-a-situation-of-huge-vecto

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Reply

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

Knowing that most weights are equal to zero you can rewrite a faster implementation of randsample from Octave source. In my timing it is 6X-7X faster than the original implementation:

function y = randsample_fast(v, w)
    f = find(w);
    w = w(f);
    w = w / sum(w);
    w = [0 cumsum(w)];
    y = f(lookup (w , rand));
    %y = f(find (w <= rand, 1, "last"));
    y = v(y);
end
  • Inputs are assumed to be row vectors.
  • Changing find to lookup may slightly improve the performance.

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
OGeek|极客中国-欢迎来到极客的世界,一个免费开放的程序员编程交流平台!开放,进步,分享!让技术改变生活,让极客改变未来! Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

...