Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
157 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

java - Are empty abstract classes suitable here?

I'm creating a GUI module that contains custom JavaFX nodes. This is the basic hierarchy of this module:

hierarchy

GuiElement looks like this:

public abstract class GuiElement<T extends Region> {

    private T rootNode;

    final void setRootNode(T val) {
        rootNode = val;
    }

    final T getRootNode() {
        return rootNode;
    }

}

Layout and Control are just empty abstract classes that extend GuiElement. I created the separation, because I want to prevent putting Layout type nodes where Control type nodes only are allowed. I think Layout and Control are "marker interfaces" in this case. From a logical point, there's no difference between Layout and Control type of node, so I couldn't offer any related function in those abstract classes.

Is this considered as a bad practice? Is there any better solution for my problem?

question from:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/66064118/are-empty-abstract-classes-suitable-here

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Reply

0 votes
by (71.8m points)
Waitting for answers

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
OGeek|极客中国-欢迎来到极客的世界,一个免费开放的程序员编程交流平台!开放,进步,分享!让技术改变生活,让极客改变未来! Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

...