Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
633 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

c - Is zero initialization of structures guaranteed to wipe padded areas?

Suppose I have the following structure:

typedef struct
{
    unsigned field1 :1;
    unsigned field2 :1;
    unsigned field3 :1;
} mytype;

The first 3 bits will be usable but sizeof(mytype) will return 4 which means 29 bits of padding. My question is, are these padding bits guaranteed by the standard to be zero initialized by the statement:

mytype testfields = {0};

or:

mytype myfields = {1, 1, 1};

Such that it's safe to perform the following memcmp() on the assumption that bits 4..29 will be zero and therefore won't affect the comparison:

if ( memcmp(&myfields, &testfields, sizeof(myfields)) == 0 )
    printf("Fields have no bits set
");
else
    printf("Fields have bits set
");
See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Reply

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

Yes and no. The actual standard, C11, specifies:

If an object that has static or thread storage duration is not initialized explicitly, then:

  • ....

  • if it is an aggregate, every member is initialized (recursively) according to these rules, and any padding is initialized to zero bits;

So this only holds for objects of static storage, at a first view. But then later it says in addition:

If there are fewer initializers in a brace-enclosed list than there are elements or members of an aggregate, or fewer characters in a string literal used to initialize an array of known size than there are elements in the array, the remainder of the aggregate shall be initialized implicitly the same as objects that have static storage duration.

So this means that padding inside sub-structures that are not initialized explicitly is zero-bit initialized.

In summarry, some padding in a structure is guaranteed to be zero-bit initialized, some isn't. I don't think that such a confusion is intentional, I will file a defect report for this.

Older versions didn't have that at all. So with most existing compilers you'd have to be even more careful, since they don't implement C11, yet. But AFAIR, clang already does on that behalf.

Also be aware that this only holds for initialization. Padding isn't necessarily copied on assignment.


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
OGeek|极客中国-欢迎来到极客的世界,一个免费开放的程序员编程交流平台!开放,进步,分享!让技术改变生活,让极客改变未来! Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

...