Benchmarks log each request/response pair while returning
'hello world', using
autocannon with 100
connections and pipelining set to 1 (koa can't handle pipelining): autocannon -c 100 -p 1 http://localhost:3000.
koa-bunyan-logger: 5844 req/sec
koa-logger: 9401 req/sec
koa-morgan: 10881 req/sec
koa-pino-logger: 10534 req/sec
koa-pino-logger (extreme): 11112 req/sec
koa w/out logger: 14518 req/sec
All benchmarks where taken on a Macbook Pro 2013 (2.6GHZ i7, 16GB of RAM).
Benchmarking against koa-logger is an apples vs oranges situation. koa-logger is for development logging, and has extremely simple (non-JSON) output. Still, koa-pino-logger is faster so... why not.
Additionally, whilst we're comparing koa-pino-logger against koa-morgan, this isn't really a fair contest.
Morgan doesn't support logging arbitrary data, nor does it output JSON. Further Morgan uses a form of eval to achieve high speed logging. Whilst probably safe, using eval at all tends to cause concern, particular when it comes to server-side JavaScript.
The fact that koa-pino-logger achieves similar throughput with JSON logging and arbitrary data, without using eval, serves to emphasise the high-speed capabilities of koa-pino-logger.
With koa-pino-logger you can have features, safety and speed.
$ node error-example.js | pino
$ node error-example.js | pino
[2016-04-21T13:05:10.298Z] ERROR (20482 on MacBook-Pro-4.local): request errored
res: {
"statusCode": 200,
"header": null
}
err: {
"type": "Error",
"message": "bang!",
"stack": "Error: bang!\n at Error (native)\n at /Users/davidclements/z/nearForm/koa-pino-logger/error-example.js:12:9\n at dispatch (/Users/davidclements/z/nearForm/koa-pino-logger/node_modules/koa/node_modules/koa-compose/index.js:43:32)\n at next (/Users/davidclements/z/nearForm/koa-pino-logger/node_modules/koa/node_modules/koa-compose/index.js:44:18)\n at pino (/Users/davidclements/z/nearForm/koa-pino-logger/logger.js:13:12)\n at dispatch (/Users/davidclements/z/nearForm/koa-pino-logger/node_modules/koa/node_modules/koa-compose/index.js:43:32)\n at /Users/davidclements/z/nearForm/koa-pino-logger/node_modules/koa/node_modules/koa-compose/index.js:36:12\n at Server.<anonymous> (/Users/davidclements/z/nearForm/koa-pino-logger/node_modules/koa/lib/application.js:135:7)\n at emitTwo (events.js:100:13)\n at Server.emit (events.js:185:7)"
}
req: {
"id": 1,
"method": "GET",
"url": "/",
"headers": {
"host": "localhost:3000",
"user-agent": "curl/7.43.0",
"accept": "*/*"
},
"remoteAddress": "::1",
"remotePort": 50934
}
[2016-04-21T13:05:10.305Z] INFO (20482 on MacBook-Pro-4.local): request completed
res: {
"statusCode": 500,
"header": "HTTP/1.1 500 Internal Server Error\r\nContent-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8\r\nContent-Length: 21\r\nDate: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 13:05:10 GMT\r\nConnection: keep-alive\r\n\r\n"
}
responseTime: 11
req: {
"id": 1,
"method": "GET",
"url": "/",
"headers": {
"host": "localhost:3000",
"user-agent": "curl/7.43.0",
"accept": "*/*"
},
"remoteAddress": "::1",
"remotePort": 50934
}
API
koa-pino-logger has the same options as
pinokoa-pino-logger will log when a request finishes or errors.
Along with automated request logging, the pino logger facilitates manual logging
by adding the pino logger instance to the the context, request, response, req and res objects:
请发表评论