Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
784 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

scala - Spark-Monotonically increasing id not working as expected in dataframe?

I have a dataframe df in Spark which looks something like this:

scala> df.show()
+--------+--------+
|columna1|columna2|
+--------+--------+
|     0.1|     0.4|
|     0.2|     0.5|
|     0.1|     0.3|
|     0.3|     0.6|
|     0.2|     0.7|
|     0.2|     0.8|
|     0.1|     0.7|
|     0.5|     0.5|
|     0.6|    0.98|
|     1.2|     1.1|
|     1.2|     1.2|
|     0.4|     0.7|
+--------+--------+

I tried to include an id column with the following code

val df_id = df.withColumn("id",monotonicallyIncreasingId)

but the id column is not what I expect:

scala> df_id.show()
+--------+--------+----------+
|columna1|columna2|        id|
+--------+--------+----------+
|     0.1|     0.4|         0|
|     0.2|     0.5|         1|
|     0.1|     0.3|         2|
|     0.3|     0.6|         3|
|     0.2|     0.7|         4|
|     0.2|     0.8|         5|
|     0.1|     0.7|8589934592|
|     0.5|     0.5|8589934593|
|     0.6|    0.98|8589934594|
|     1.2|     1.1|8589934595|
|     1.2|     1.2|8589934596|
|     0.4|     0.7|8589934597|
+--------+--------+----------+

As you can see, it goes well from 0 to 5 but then the next id is 8589934592 instead of 6 and so on.

So what is wrong here? Why is the id column not properly indexed here?

See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Reply

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

It works as expected. This function is not intended for generating consecutive values. Instead it encodes partition number and index by partition

The generated ID is guaranteed to be monotonically increasing and unique, but not consecutive. The current implementation puts the partition ID in the upper 31 bits, and the record number within each partition in the lower 33 bits. The assumption is that the data frame has less than 1 billion partitions, and each partition has less than 8 billion records.

As an example, consider a DataFrame with two partitions, each with 3 records. This expression would return the following IDs:

0, 1, 2, 8589934592 (1L << 33), 8589934593, 8589934594.

If you want consecutive numbers, use RDD.zipWithIndex.


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
OGeek|极客中国-欢迎来到极客的世界,一个免费开放的程序员编程交流平台!开放,进步,分享!让技术改变生活,让极客改变未来! Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

...